CancerFax

Lisocabtagene maraleucel is approved by FDA for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Susan HauWritten by Susan HauMedically ReviewedUpdated June 20, 20242 min read
Lisocabtagene maraleucel is approved by FDA for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma
In this article
  1. Lisocabtagene maraleucel is approved by FDA for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma
  2. How CancerFax Helps

Lisocabtagene maraleucel is approved by FDA for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

May 2024: The Food and Drug Administration has granted approval to lisocabtagene maraleucel (Breyanzi, Juno Therapeutics, Inc.) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have undergone at least two previous rounds of systemic therapy, which includes the use of a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi).

The efficacy of the treatment was assessed in a clinical trial called TRANSCEND-MCL (NCT02631044). The study looked at adult patients with relapsed or refractory MCL who had already tried at least two types of treatment, such as a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, an alkylating agent, and an anti-CD20 drug. The trial was open-label, multicenter, and single-arm in design.

People with an ECOG performance rating of 1 or lower, a history of autologous and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and a history of central nervous system lymphoma were eligible for the trial. There was no predetermined limit for blood counts. Patients were allowed to participate in the study, provided the investigator determined that they had sufficient bone marrow function to take lymphodepleting treatment.

Patients were administered a solitary dose of lisocabtagene maraleucel within a time frame of 2 to 7 days after the conclusion of lymphodepleting chemotherapy, consisting of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) administered concurrently for a duration of 3 days. The primary efficacy analysis involved 68 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who had received at least two previous lines of treatment, including a BTK inhibitor.

These patients had PET-positive disease either at the beginning of the study, or after receiving bridging therapy. They were given the intended dose of the treatment and were followed up for at least six months from the date of their initial response.

The overall response rate (ORR) was the percentage of patients who had either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) after getting an infusion of lisocabtagene maraleucel. It was used as the main measure of how well the treatment worked. An independent review committee (IRC) used the 2014 Lugano classification to make this determination.

The Independent Review Committee (IRC) determined that the rate of complete response (CRR) and the length of the response (DOR) were additional indicators of effectiveness. The overall response rate (ORR) was 85.3%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 74.6% to 92.7%. The complete response rate (CRR) was 67.6%, with a 95% CI ranging from 55.2% to 78.5%. The median duration of response (DOR) was 13.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0, 23.3) after a median follow-up of 22.2 months (95% CI: 16.7, 22.8).

The predominant nonlaboratory adverse events, occurring in at least 20% of cases, included cytokine release syndrome (CRS), exhaustion, musculoskeletal discomfort, encephalopathy, edema, headache, and decreased appetite. The FDA has granted approval to lisocabtagene maraleucel, along with a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, due to the potential for severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities.

The optimal dosage for lisocabtagene maraleucel is between 90 and 110 million CAR-positive viable T cells, with an equal proportion of CD4 and CD8 components.

How CancerFax Helps

CancerFax is a specialist cancer access and patient-navigation platform. We help patients and families understand their options, organise medical records, coordinate hospital communication, and support cross-border treatment planning where appropriate.

description
Medical Record Review

We help collect and organise reports, scans, pathology, biomarker results, and treatment history for structured case review.

verified_user
Eligibility Coordination

We communicate with hospitals or trial teams to assess whether a case may be suitable for further screening.

hub
Hospital Communication

We support appointment coordination, document submission, translation, and direct communication with international departments.

flight
Travel & Admission Support

For international patients, we help with practical coordination — travel planning, hospital admission guidance, and local support.

explore
Treatment & Trial Navigation

If this option is not suitable, we help explore other relevant treatments, clinical trials, or advanced care pathways.

support_agent
End-to-end Coordination

From inquiry through to follow-up, our coordinators provide a single point of contact for the family.

CancerFax does not guarantee treatment access, eligibility, or clinical outcome. Our role is to help patients access accurate information, structured review, and appropriate specialist pathways.

Susan Hau

About Susan Hau

Susan Hau is a distinguished researcher in the field of cancer cell therapy, with a particular focus on T cell-based approaches and cancer vaccines. Her work spans several innovative treatment modalities, including CAR T-cell therapy, TIL (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte) therapy, and NK (Natural Killer) cell therapy. Hau's expertise lies in cancer cell biolo…

✓ Reviewed for medical accuracy by the CancerFax review panel.

Medical Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only and should not replace medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified oncology specialist. Every patient's case is different. Treatment decisions should always be made after a review of complete medical records by the treating medical team.

Treatment availability, eligibility, timelines, and access can change. Any clinical trial participation depends on detailed review and approval by the trial hospital or investigator.