CancerFax

Brigatinib for ALK-positive crizotinib resistant non-small cell lung cancer

Susan HauWritten by Susan HauMedically ReviewedUpdated April 13, 20206 min read
Brigatinib for ALK-positive crizotinib resistant non-small cell lung cancer
In this article
  1. ASCO 2016: Brigatinib Phase II Trial Overview
  2. Study Methodology and Patient Demographics
  3. Efficacy Results and Safety Profile
  4. How CancerFax Helps

ASCO 2016: Brigatinib Phase II Trial Overview

Dong-Wan Kim scholars from the Seoul National University Hospital in South Korea will give an oral report on the special meeting of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago on June 6, 2016 local time: the first report An important randomized phase II clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of using Brigatinib (BRG) in patients with ALK + crizotinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

BRG is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the observation period. It has preclinical activity against ALK rearrangements and CRZ-resistant mutations. This clinical phase 1/2 trial shows good prospects for BRG. Both BRG’s response rate and AEs can vary with the starting dose, therefore, in this ongoing randomized study, two BRG use options were evaluated.

The results of this study show that BRG has a clear response to treatment, stable PFS, and acceptable safety characteristics. Therefore, they plan to conduct a phase III clinical trial comparing CRZ BRG 90 mg qd * 7 days and 180 mg qd in patients with ALK + advanced NSCLC and CRZ in patients who have not used TKI.

Study Methodology and Patient Demographics

In this trial, patients ≥ 18 years of age, ALK + NSCLC progressed after using CRZ and no other ALK TKI patients were available. According to whether the patient has a baseline condition of intracranial metastasis and the best response to the previous use of CRZ, the patients were randomly divided into 1: 1 oral BRG 90 mg qd (group A) or 90 mg qd x 7d and 180 mg qd (B group).

The primary endpoint is observation-assessment-confirmation of ORR per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include PFS and IRC to assess formal ORR and CNS responses. 222 patients were randomly divided into A / B group, n = 112 / n = 110. As of September 21, 2015, the last patient was included. The average age was 51/57 years old, and 71% / 67% had brain metastases.

Efficacy Results and Safety Profile

The proportion of patients in groups A and B was 63% / 74% while the experiment was still in progress on December 7, 2015, and the average duration of treatment was 25 weeks / 23 weeks. Observation-assessment of group A: 46% of confirmed ORR (39 confirmed reactions + 12 single responses waiting to be confirmed), including 1 confirmed complete response (CRs); ORR of group B: 54% (49 confirmed reactions) + 10 responses awaiting confirmation), including 5 confirmed CRs. The median PFS for A / B is 8.8 months / 11.1 months.

Toxic events in group A / B were 44/25, the most common emergency treatment AEs of grade ≥ 3, group A / B included: increased CPK (3% / 8%), hypertension (4% / 5%), Lung infection (3% / 5%), rash (1% / 4%), elevated blood lipids (3% / 2%) and pneumonia (2% / 3%). In 6% of patients, pulmonary events occurred at an early stage (3% ≥ grade 3 within 7 days of initiation of treatment); this event was not seen in group B and increased to 180 mg within 7 days of initiation of treatment and thereafter. The interruption and reduction of A / B group due to AEs were 3% / 6% and 7% / 18%, respectively.

How CancerFax Helps

CancerFax is a specialist cancer access and patient-navigation platform. We help patients and families understand their options, organise medical records, coordinate hospital communication, and support cross-border treatment planning where appropriate.

description
Medical Record Review

We help collect and organise reports, scans, pathology, biomarker results, and treatment history for structured case review.

verified_user
Eligibility Coordination

We communicate with hospitals or trial teams to assess whether a case may be suitable for further screening.

hub
Hospital Communication

We support appointment coordination, document submission, translation, and direct communication with international departments.

flight
Travel & Admission Support

For international patients, we help with practical coordination — travel planning, hospital admission guidance, and local support.

explore
Treatment & Trial Navigation

If this option is not suitable, we help explore other relevant treatments, clinical trials, or advanced care pathways.

support_agent
End-to-end Coordination

From inquiry through to follow-up, our coordinators provide a single point of contact for the family.

CancerFax does not guarantee treatment access, eligibility, or clinical outcome. Our role is to help patients access accurate information, structured review, and appropriate specialist pathways.

Susan Hau

About Susan Hau

Susan Hau is a distinguished researcher in the field of cancer cell therapy, with a particular focus on T cell-based approaches and cancer vaccines. Her work spans several innovative treatment modalities, including CAR T-cell therapy, TIL (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte) therapy, and NK (Natural Killer) cell therapy. Hau's expertise lies in cancer cell biolo…

✓ Reviewed for medical accuracy by the CancerFax review panel.

Medical Disclaimer

This article is for educational purposes only and should not replace medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment from a qualified oncology specialist. Every patient's case is different. Treatment decisions should always be made after a review of complete medical records by the treating medical team.

Treatment availability, eligibility, timelines, and access can change. Any clinical trial participation depends on detailed review and approval by the trial hospital or investigator.